Yesterday I was listening to a comment about Big Ass singer and alledged mom of his son. The news was with a twist that finally the girl found out who was her child’s father. However, the singer would be charged with, according to the commentator “underage obsenity with consenting minor.”
Let me put it clearly that I am dealing with “consenting” minors, not sex tourism, commercial sexual exploitation, rape, sexual harrasment against unconsenting minors or adults. Let’s take it that the girl was consent, as far as I heard of in the news and the charge against her. Still it was wrong.
It was aginst the law.
I am not going to discuss on other matters like whther it is wrong to seduce girls, whether the singer was exploited. Let’s take this to impersonnal level.
Someone or something define what is a ligitimate sexualities. For minors, someone point out that it is, though both parties consent, wrong to have sex when you are “minors.” According to THai law, minor obsenity and having sex with minoer is a crime, not only against the sate but also against the parents. The charge could be literrally translated as “taking away a minor [from parent or guardian].” If the offended is under 15, this is an uncompromised crime in court. If a minor (over15 -18) was offended, this could be compromised and worked out between parents, arbitrators, and social worker. The marriable age in Thailand is 18 for males and 17 for females, but they have to obtain permission in the certificate from parents.
This event promt me to look beyond personal arangement and question the way sexualities could be directly governed and punishable. Despite the will of a person, if under 18, to engage in a sexual activity is illegal. The person who has sex with consenting minors from 15 to under 18 is violating the law. On the other hand, I would read this as a person at that age range is not allow to have consenting sex legally.
The state decides, at least for minors, when to have sex, what are compromised model of sex (e.g. to gove pardon to perpetrator, if the girl over 13-15 consented and later they could marry under court order, the perpetrator would not be punished.), or uncompromised model, what is “consenting” and what is forced. Though the roles of state to determine legitimate and redress for minor’s sexual activities are often breached (according to many child sex survey researchers.)
And for some remark, on the other hand, it was reported that the girl used to be a “men’s magazine” model. She was a mother at 17 and might be modeling before 17. This also raise question about “pretection of sexualities” by the state. At about 16 or 17, she was consent to post nude on a magazine. Does she also need state protection on being commercially exposed to pornography, too?
Compose with dialogues and suggestions from Thitinob Komalnimi and Passakorn Indhuman.